Problem Based Learning:
Chicago History at Roosevelt University
![]() |
| Charlie Madigan |
I asked for and got student permission to do this, so it's not like any of them will be shocked. But I wanted to start with a little description of what we are covering, the size of the class, some relevant details. There are 24 students in this ACP250 class. They are broken into four groups of six each, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs and Spades. From the first class to the last class, they will work in teams on projects aimed at explaining how Chicago was born and the kinds of issues that defined its history.
That's a blessing. My initial experiences with it in the ACP 250 class indicate it is a great candidate for class work in the future, given a solid collection of students with good skills. The biggest challenge for me as a teacher is to stand back and let the process take its course. What you learn from that experience is that students may be their own best teachers, particularly when they engage with the subject.
The challenge to the students was to write a letter to President Madison explaining the context of the Ft. Dearborn Massacre. This is a complicated subject that offers a chance to examine many different perspectives. Was it a massacre, as the whites claimed, or was it a military battle, as the Pottawatomi claimed? What were the details? Who was to "blame?" What role did the event play in the virtual banishment of native Americans from what once was known as "Indian Territory"
The Hearts team constructed a complete website, but built it in the context of the event. If President Madison had had the internet, and the Native Americans, too, this is what this team thought they might come up with.
| The Hearts Team, Melvin Hassan, Ana Garduno, Michelle Groller, Nicole Kasper, Madelyn Olsen and Amelia Enberg |
It didn't stop there, of course. The Diamonds team on the first day of presentations set up a mock trial, The United States Vs. The Pottowatomi, and went through the steps of a civil trial to present the research on both sides. The legal battle was over the use of the word "massacre."
![]() |
| Tyler Olmsted, Lawyer for Native Americans |
| The government's team: Nathanial Stoll, Tyler Strejc and Mary Strickler |
![]() |
| Native American defense team, Tyler Olmsted and Kurt Witteman |
The third team researched and constructed an entire theater piece on the Massacre and the events leading up to it. Mike Vivirito played a military officer reporting to President Madison, artfully represented by Sam Crane. The supporting staff prepared and displayed a running, compelling video behind the action that filled in the blanks. In constume as Major Whistler, Vivirito read the report to Sam's President Madison.
The Clubs team decided to use a detailed timeline that marched across the front of the room to set the stage for a news conference with President Madison. The questions and answers told the Ft. Dearborn story chapter and verse. Very compelling.
| Stephi Liebl and Jocelyn Castro asking questions of President Madison... |
Charlie Madigan



What a creative group! Bring on more problems!
ReplyDeleteI wish that I would of had a history teacher that was able to make this creative learning process so interesting. Would have made such a difference. Well done students & teacher Charlie!
ReplyDeleteHad YOU been my history teacher maybe I would have even enjoyed learning!
ReplyDelete